Whether Petitioner's conviction and continued incarceration under Nevada Revised Statute 207.010 violates the due process clause of the Federal Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment

No question identified. : t RuestTiovs PResen7TeEs a : 5 1. Whether Rebitiones’s coavictién arch coattaued to carcesahan, y onbor Nevada Revised svatule 2087 20, ace dacensis teat 5 wrdR tha dow process classe oC tke Frdosal Gast ottea’s 6 Foscteanthy Arendaient 7 7 ; g. ZbohstRec Re duc process clause aC he Faderal q Constitatieoo'’s Foucternth Amendacrat requires tKe state wo .covst 43 appl y its ta teepsetotien aad dard Beofign ef « uv Stade ecinzaal Statute Petroactively % Rftqners ease 2 30 Collcteral revi 3 “3. WWheihsc Refitiongris case presents anise oh etroachvity ? 1S lo 4, Wwhethar the Nevada Suprend Cousshs inferpretovts a end 7 clas Geadton oF NS 209.730, in Gagfaneds was the corrrct 1¢ Stat wmeant s Clos at the tioe Retitiongels conviction became “7 £ rol 2 ZO ze 5. WhedRoe multiple convictiaas and sentences Brio 22 SrA gle Vialation obo. state. eciainal Stetute constitutes 23 double jeopardy Vielatloas aad dog process Viclons © 24 _ 25 6. luhadhoe Aevade con, consistently with Re Federal Dun Pracess 26 Clouse, convict Petitoase Bc condurcst Rat Ms ceouvaal statente, 77 85 properly infaspreled, dees not perma’? 2.—