Jeff Baoliang Zhang v. County of Los Angeles, California, et al.
SocialSecurity
Whether federal courts can take serious civil rights violations as frivolous
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (A) willfully refused to help a seriously wounded man at county jail, but the US District Court for the Central District of California and the Nineth Circuit all took such violations as frivolous. Why do these federal court judges behave so inhumanly as to take horrible human rights violations as nothing? (B) did not allow Petitioner to have a different attorney for the criminal case and blocked all my communication at county jail throughout my detention time. These federal courts also took such violations as frivolous. What kind of bizarre laws do they practice at the federal courts? (C) Why can the Central District Court of California and the Nineth Circuit openly violate the Bill of Rights in the US constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to use double standards in ruling a case based on race, national origin, political belief, social-economic status, and age? Who allowed them so inhumanly to deal with the less advantaged class?