(1).Does the fatal Variance from the indictment violate Mr.Walkers' Due process rights, v ;i*. i
when he is convicted of and imprisonment for "Controlled Substance" named in the
indictment,that the lab results proved not to be the substances Sold,or controlled
substance at the time of the investigation.

(2).Does Petitioner Walker being enhanced under Conspiracy for the Money Laundering
and also being charged separately for Money Laundering Constitute duplicitous
sentencing and violate Mr.Walker right to be sentenced to serve one punishment for
one particular crime as stated in the constitution of the United States,Does not
the Consecutive 5years sentence for money laundering and the 2 point enhancement
for money laundering violate duplicitous sentencing.

(3). Does not Mr.Walker serving an unjust sentence for controlled substances from
2018-2020 when in fact the substances sold were not controlled substances from
2018. The substance Eulylone became a controlled substance only 6 months before the
indictment and a-PiHP became a controlled substance 3 months after Mr.Walkers'
indictment and again the substances named in the indictment were controlled
substances ,but the lab results ultimately proved that the drugs named in the
indictment were not the substances sold.Does not Mr.Walker being calculated under
"Controlled substance" offense for substances the lab results proved were not
"Controlled Substance" from 2018-0ct 2020 for the Eutylone and April 2021 for thea
-PiHp constitute an imperative fundamentally unjust sentence and incarceration
considering the indictment remanded unchanged.

(4).Did the government intentionally and deliberately violate Mr.Walker due process k.,
when,during sentencing,when asked by the Judge what in fact the drugs were that
were tested,and the government read the information for A-PVP and MDMA instead
of the information for the actual substances sold which was a-PiHP not a
controlled substance offense at the time of the indictment and Eutylone which only
became a controlled substances 6 months before the indictment.Did not this fatal
error by the government mislead the judge and bias the outcome of Mr.walker
sentence violating his right to due process.( t.

(5).Did the government violate due process when they calculated Mr.Walkers
substance sold as a "controlled substance" from 2018 when neither substance
"actually and factually" sold was a controlled substance before Oct, 2020. And even
then only Eutylone became a controlled substance.Did the Misrepresentation of the
substance as a "controlled substance" from 2018 cause Mr.Walker base level
calculation to be prejudiced and incorrect.

(6). Was the conspiracy charged in this case "factually unlawful" when it relied
on the "controlled substance" clause to make it unlawful, yet the lab results
proved the substances "actually sold" not to be "controlled substances".
Conspiracy in and of itself is not a crime. Conspiring to sell sugar which is not
a controlled substance is not a crime, therefore considering Mr. Walker sold
substances that were not "controlled substances" would that not constittued his
conspiracy not criminal and not a crime.

(7

Due-process-violation