Whether the district court properly committed Appellant to the custody and care of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246

QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether the district court properly “committ[ed] [Appellant] to the custody and care of the Attorney General” pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246, given that Appellant was no longer in the valid custody of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d). . The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to rule on this fundamental issue of due process, calling it a “thorny issue!" In addition the Court: misrepresented the facts, Stating that | did not raise the due process objections during my Hearing. However, | certainly did raise the due process objections most vehemently; and | have included the transcript pages that prove my claim as the attachment labeled