No. 23-730
Anna Pezhman v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration arbitration-law civil-rights civil-rights-act-1964 equitable-doctrine federal-preemption impartiality impartiality-doctrine judicial-intervention quota-system title-vii
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA
Arbitration ERISA
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does federal law preempt New York's mandatory equitable doctrine of seeking court intervention in mid-arbitration proceedings to remedy arbitral impartiality?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . : 1. Does Federal Law pre-empt New. York’s mandatory equitable doctrine of seeking court intervention in mid-arbitration proceedings to . -remedy arbitral impartiality? ; 2. What is evident partiality? 8. Is the implementation of a mandatory quota system vis-a-vis hiring Blacks, in response solely . to the Black Lives Movement demonstrations, violative of the Civil Rights Act 1964, Title VII?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Bloomingdales, Inc to respond filed.
2024-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Bloomingdales, Inc
Michael Corey Christman — Macy's Law Department, Respondent
Michael Corey Christman — Macy's Law Department, Respondent