Whether the trial court erred by sentencing the petitioner to 20 years despite a plea bargain agreement for a maximum of 10 years

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . ‘ ; (1). In accordance with Judicial Discretion,once the trial Judge ; accepted and approved the plea bargain agreement for the maximum of ten years.did the trial court erred bv sentencing petitioner to a twenty years?. (2).The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals,and Federal Constitution, once the possible maximum is set,the trial court must honor it?. (3).The Supreme Court of the United States has no related cases that shows "once the trial court bound itself in the plea bargain as to the maximum’ possible sentence,the court must carry out . such sentence'?. : (4).The Court of Appeals,erred by ignoring the plea bargain agree. ment,specially when there was no initials on the cross-out,and also ignoring the Code of criminal Procedure art.26.13(a)(2)?. (5).The trial Judge knew-of the conflict of interest,and that defense counsel wassworking biased with petitioner,but did nothing to resolved the issue,wds the court abusing its ‘discretion?. (6).The trial court approved and accepted the plea bargain,but the court continue admonishing petitioner wrong,and defense counsel never aid ,or correct the court,but instead render ineffective assistance,was this failure of the court? or the defense counsel?, , or both?. ws (7).The Court of Criminal Appeals as the maximum authority in criminal law,did the court erred by not addressing petitioner claims?,or was this abused of judicial discretion?. (8).Petitioner present the appeals court with 3 or 4 petitions for writ of mandamus,to correct petitioner's sentence,but the court abused its discretion by requesting items not needed,is this right?.