No. 23-7303
Demetriaus L. Blaylock v. Illinois
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law criminal-justice cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment emerging-adults juvenile-justice miller-v-alabama sentencing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment requires the protections granted under Miller v. Alabama to be extended to emerging adults
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE EIGHT AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSITUTION'S PROHIBITION AGAINST CRUEL; AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT REQUIRE THE PROTECTION GRANTED UNDER MILLER V. ALABAMA AND ITS PROGENY TO BE EXTENDED TO EMERGING ADULTS? '
Docket Entries
2024-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2023-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2024)
Attorneys
Illinois