No. 23-7312
James Bennett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether consideration of acquitted conduct by the District Court in consideration of Bennett's ultimate sentence violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether consideration of acquitted conduct by the District Court in consideration of Bennett’s ultimate sentence violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution. i
Docket Entries
2024-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2024)
Attorneys
James Bennett
James Nelsen — Stowers & Nelsen PLC, Petitioner
James Nelsen — Stowers & Nelsen PLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent