Is a certified mail receipt and date-stamp from the United States Postal Service along with the Prison Mailroom time-stamp enough to meet the requirements for timely filing set forth by this Court in Houston v. Lack 487 US 266, 108 S.ct. 2379 (1988) and the requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25(a)(2)(A) (iii)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Is a certified mail receipt and date-stamp from the United . States Postal Service along with the Prison Mailroom time-stamp enough to meet the requirements for timely filing set forth by this Court in Houston v. Lack 487 US 266, 108 S.ct. 2379 (1988). and the requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25(a)(2)(A) (iii)? . Is it the responsibility of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to correct their own clerical error which bars access to their court and The United States Supreme Court when there is opportunity to remedy it? RELIEF SOUGHT 1) Mandate that the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals accept the Petition for Panel Reconsideration as timely. 2) Recall the Mandate of the Eighth Circuit's ORDER from May 16, 2023.