Should Michael A. Maggio benefit from subsequent rulings of the United States Supreme Court that 18 U.S.C § 666(a)(1)(B) was limited to property rights thereby making the statute under which Maggio pleaded guilty inapplicable to find him guilty entitling him to an order to dismiss the Information and entry of an order Nunc Pro Tunc or other such device to place Mr. Maggio in the position he was in before the indictment?

QUESTION PRESENTED Should Michael A. Maggio benefit from subsequent rulings of the United States Supreme Court that 18 U.S.C § 666(a)(1)(B) was limited to property rights thereby making the statute under which Maggio pleaded guilty inapplicable to find him guilty entitling him to an order to dismiss the Information and entry of an order Nunc Pro Tunc or other such device to place Mr. Maggio in the position he was in before the indictment? 2