Whether Judge Ranjan Abused his discretion in § 1915(2)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Judge Ranjan Abused his discretion in § 1915(2)? 2. Whether it was possible to achieve due process, when there are three jurisdictions causing catastrophes of death and two refusing to Reopen cases that caused the harm? 3. Did Case No. 2:15-cv-00214-J need to exist? Or was it the U.S. Courts Violating the Fourteenth Amendment: Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, by allowing retaliation for California Case DR090936? 4. Was the illegal entry into the petitioner’s property at 4579 Cummings Road, Eureka CA., a Violation of the Fourth and Eighth Amendments: illegal search and seizure, and other laws? 5. Whether the CA3, should have Required a new Judge and Case, due to violations of 28 U.S.C. § 455(a)(b)(1)(5)Gv)? And corrected the errors in the Order? 6. Should California and Texas U.S.D.C. Judges have Recused themselves in the Request to Reopen Cases? 7. Has the U.S. Courts Discriminated against the petitioner, since Supreme Court Case No. 10-9095, in their discretions? 8. Whether the petitioner has been discriminated against by the Veterans Affairs Administration for 50 years, in determining eligibility in her ratings, and privileges? 9. Is it time to Repeal 38 U.S.C § 511(a), for Violating 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2)(3), in issuing a fifty percent rating for loss of reproduction organ, and willfully denying Military Sexual Trauma, by means of Fraud? II . A an | i 10. Whether the Supreme Court of the U.S. erred in Closing — Case No. 16-9258, which led to the illegal theft of my property, respondents operating on my carotid artery, furtherance of Violating 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3); and my father to be locked in Kirkland Court Nursing Home, until his death 2019? 11. Did the CA3 participate in furtherance of Violations of 42 U.S.C. 1985(3), by allowing for Ninth Cir. Court of Appeals Case No. 15-16288 to be followed by PAWD U.S.D.C. Case 21-01152; which is clearly in Violation of the Eight Amendment: dignity? 12. Why wasn’t Cases CAND Case:14-03008-CRB; or TXND Case: 15-00214-Z Investigated for Fraud