No. 23-7348
Oksana Marinaro v. Cheryl Eddy Benn, PC
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: case-mootness civil-procedure court-order due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-appointment procedural-notice retirement standing state-statute
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a retired judge preside over a case without an appointment required by a state statute?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1). The XIV Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the due process of law. Can a retired judge preside over the case without an appointment required by a state statute? ; 2). The XIV Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the due process. Is a case moot if a party voluntarily pays the judgement from the appeal bond under the compulsion of the court order without knowing her rights and without a notice of hearing regarding the appeal bond distribution between the parties? i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-08
Petitioner complied with order of June 17, 2024.
2024-06-17
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 8, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2024-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-05-14
Waiver of right of respondent Cheryl Eddy Benn, P.C. to respond filed.
2024-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 30, 2024)
Attorneys
Cheryl Eddy Benn, P.C.
Cheryl E. Benn — Cheryl Eddy Benn, P.C., Respondent
Cheryl E. Benn — Cheryl Eddy Benn, P.C., Respondent