No. 23-736
Bernard Gadson v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law agency-deference criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-review loss-calculation sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does deference to the Sentencing Commission's commentary to USSG § 2B1.1, cmt. n.3(A), expanding the meaning of "loss" to include "intended loss," violate the applicable limitations on deference to agency interpretations?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does deference to the Sentencing Commission's commentary to USSG § 2B1.1, cmt. n.3(A), expanding the meaning of 'loss' to include 'intended loss,' violate the applicable limitations on deference to agency interpretations?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2024)
2023-11-01
Application (23A391) granted by Justice Jackson extending the time to file until January 6, 2024.
2023-10-27
Application (23A391) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 7, 2023 to January 6, 2024, submitted to Justice Jackson.
Attorneys
Bernard Gadson
William McGinley Jay — Goodwin Procter, LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent