No. 23-7367

John E. Garrett v. Richard Clouse

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bail bail-revocation constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment judicial-proceedings liberty liberty-interest standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is notice and a hearing required, prior to depriving one of his liberty pending trial and does said liberty qualify as a substantive and/or procedural component of the Due Process Clause?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED © I. Is notice and a hearing required, prior to depriving one of his liberty pending trial and does said liberty qualify as a substantive and/or procedural component of the Due Process Clause? . 2. In cases involving arbitrary deprivation of liberty, at what point is the deprivation complete and the Due Process Clause violated and what must be done to correct this constitutional violation? 3. What qualifies as excessive bail under the Eighth "Amendment and what considerations does due process require when determining what amount of bail is required in cases of revocation? a (11)

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-28
Waiver of right of respondent Richard Clouse to respond filed.
2024-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2024)

Attorneys

John E. Garrett
John E. Garrett — Petitioner
John E. Garrett — Petitioner
Richard Clouse
Melanie K NelsonLake County State's Attorney's Office, Respondent
Melanie K NelsonLake County State's Attorney's Office, Respondent