No. 23-7369

Robert George Jefferson v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 404(b)-motion 404b 404c complete-review-provision concurrent-sentencing-doctrine due-process fifth-amendment first-step-act
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does declining to review the merits of a 404(b) petition violate the complete-review provision of 404(c)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . This case present's important and lonstanding issues of both "FIRST STEP ACT" law and Fifth Amendment law. Oo ~ QUESTION 4 } Does "DECLINING TO REVIEW" the merits of a 404(b) petition violate the "Complete Review" Provision of 404(c)? , QUESTION 2) Can a district court "DECLINE TO.REVIEW" or "OPT AGAINST ADDRESSING A PETITIONER'S . CLAIMS" in a 404(b) motion without violating the defendants "Fifth Amendment Right" to Due Process of law? : . QUESTION 3) Can a district court deny a 404(b) motion Pursuant to the "CONCURRENT SENTENCING DOCTRINE” | . and NOT violate the "COMPLETE REVIEW" Provision of 404(c)? . QUESTION 4) Can a district court rule contradictive to Congress intent and add a(n) additional Limitation to : a Statue? \ 2 3 ° . .

Docket Entries

2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2024)

Attorneys

Robert Jefferson
Robert George Jefferson — Petitioner
Robert George Jefferson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent