No. 23-7373
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 42-usc-1981 civil-procedure civil-rights double-jeopardy due-process emergency-petition first-amendment free-speech standing subject-matter-jurisdiction younger-abstention
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner is foreclosed from presenting a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and double jeopardy claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Petitioner is foreclosed from presenting a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and double jeopardy claim through an EMERGENCY PETITION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a) under “full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings”, Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 56, 19 S. Ct. 746 (1971) and, pursuant to the United States Constitution, Amendment I, “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” when all venues have been exhausted. tt , Giovanni DePalma v. State of Florida, et al,
Docket Entries
2024-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-05-06
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2024-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2024)
Attorneys
Florida
Giovanni DePalma
Giovanni DePalma — Petitioner