No. 23-7373

Giovanni DePalma v. Florida

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 42-usc-1981 civil-procedure civil-rights double-jeopardy due-process emergency-petition first-amendment free-speech standing subject-matter-jurisdiction younger-abstention
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Petitioner is foreclosed from presenting a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and double jeopardy claim

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Petitioner is foreclosed from presenting a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and double jeopardy claim through an EMERGENCY PETITION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a) under “full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings”, Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 56, 19 S. Ct. 746 (1971) and, pursuant to the United States Constitution, Amendment I, “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” when all venues have been exhausted. tt , Giovanni DePalma v. State of Florida, et al,

Docket Entries

2024-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-05-06
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2024-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2024)

Attorneys

Florida
Marilyn Frances MuirOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Giovanni DePalma
Giovanni DePalma — Petitioner