No. 23-7377
Christopher J. Barnett v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bias judicial-discretion legal-procedure local-court procedural-fairness recusal standing
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-a-biased-judge-must-recuse-themselves
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | May A Biased Challewed Tudge Refuse. fo Recuse Claiming that peti tiewers Mb tow Pe Queshry AiS -fecuSPlL Efuotevs bad without. mer it? Dib Suche David Gotew Ave Jodee Dawn Mvody Dewy pewHorver Due PU O6CES Under Oklahomas Rule 15 PrdvedveKe bY Fauigy +0 Shox proceedingS Uhl pho tions ) Of, . te Reese, were Cxrhaussed ? Dib Tulse Davin Gutew pbuse bls piscresow Bin Cowtmuing 6 FiBL With A mand pms 70 Réecuse him Filed iw He OCLAé
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2024)