Whether the lower court erred in denying COA on the claim of prosecutorial misconduct

QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION 1(A): Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA On The Claim Of Prosecutorial Misconduct Where The State Refused To Reveal Evidence And Facts In Their Possession Which Are Material And Favorable To The Defense, In Violation Of The Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution. QUESTION 1(B). Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA On The Claim Of Prosecutorial Misconduct In Contaminating Evidence, In Violation Of The Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution. QUESTION 1(C), Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA On The Claim Of _ Contamination Of Evidence, In Violation Of The Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution. QUESTION 2: Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA On The Claim Of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel At Trial As Guaranteed By The Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Of The U.S. Constitution, In Violation Of The Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution. QUESTION 2(A): Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA On The Claim Of Ineffective Counsel For Failing To Motion The Court To Order Further DNA Analysis, In Violation Of The Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution, QUESTION 2(B): Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA On The Claim Of Ineffective Counsel For Failure To Investigate, In Violation Of The F ifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution. QUESTION 2(C): Whether The Lower Court Erred Denying COA On The Claim Of Ineffective Counsel For Failing To present a “stand Your Ground Defense,” In Violation Of The Fifth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment To The Constitution. Petitioner respectfully suggests these questions are worthy of this Honorable Court’s review. il Bs 13 . ; ,