Whether the appellant court abused its discretion when it failed to issue the writ of mandamus to the district judge directing the district judge to vacate Jones's criminal convictions for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the district court's assumption of jurisdiction over this cause of action meets the exceptional circumstances amounting to a judicial usurpation of power.

Whether the writ of mandamus should issue to the district judge to compel him to set aside judgments in Jones's criminal case because it appears from the record that the district court in taking Jones from the custody of the state authorities transcended its jurisdiction.

Whether the writ of mandamus should issue to the district judge to compel him to dismiss Jones's criminal case of murder for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the district judge wrongfully assumed jurisdiction over this then pending said case that was originally brought in state court and because no act of congress could have authorized Jones's local murder state case to be transferred from the state court to the federal district court.

Whether the district court abused its discretion in failing to issue the writ of mandamus