No. 23-7396
Francisco Manuel Padilla v. California
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion legal-standard standing superior-court
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the superior court has the authority to debase the constitutional rights of a defendant
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Xs XT HE AUTHORITY OF THE SUPERIOR CODRY To DEBASE ‘THE. CONSTETUTZONAL RIGHTS OF A DEFENDANT? So IS IT THE FOUNDAMION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT TO BE OF DESCEPLINE CORRESPONDING TO A DEFENDANT [S] ATTORNEY YO MANE PULATE » VERBAL UNFORTUNATE « AND MISERY A CLZENT INTO PLEADING ? =S IT APPROPRIATE OF THE SUPERTDR CouRT TO ILGNORE THE CHARACTERISUCS OF INEFFECTIVE ASSZESTANCE OF COUNSEL 2? TS REASON, AND SOUND SUDGMENT THE ASCRIBE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ? IF SO WHAT REASON, AND WHAT SOUND SUDGMENT MASYERFULED THE. SUPERIOR CDURT UNCONSEQUENTIEAL IN THES MATTER ?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2024-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2024)
Attorneys
California
Francisco M. Padilla
Francisco M. Padilla — Petitioner