No. 23-7396

Francisco Manuel Padilla v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-05-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion legal-standard standing superior-court
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the superior court has the authority to debase the constitutional rights of a defendant

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Xs XT HE AUTHORITY OF THE SUPERIOR CODRY To DEBASE ‘THE. CONSTETUTZONAL RIGHTS OF A DEFENDANT? So IS IT THE FOUNDAMION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT TO BE OF DESCEPLINE CORRESPONDING TO A DEFENDANT [S] ATTORNEY YO MANE PULATE » VERBAL UNFORTUNATE « AND MISERY A CLZENT INTO PLEADING ? =S IT APPROPRIATE OF THE SUPERTDR CouRT TO ILGNORE THE CHARACTERISUCS OF INEFFECTIVE ASSZESTANCE OF COUNSEL 2? TS REASON, AND SOUND SUDGMENT THE ASCRIBE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ? IF SO WHAT REASON, AND WHAT SOUND SUDGMENT MASYERFULED THE. SUPERIOR CDURT UNCONSEQUENTIEAL IN THES MATTER ?

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2024-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2024)

Attorneys

California
Michael Andre CanzoneriOffice of the Attorney General, CA Dept of Justice, Respondent
Francisco M. Padilla
Francisco M. Padilla — Petitioner