Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. A procedural § 2244 one(1)-year ruling (Doc.1)(Doc. 1875)(Doc. 1893) governed by Federal Rule 36 of Appellate Procedure’, proper_ ly vested this court with subject-matter jurisdiction over a Certificate of Appealability (COA) to equitably re-open this judgement (Doc. 90), Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 777-780 csth cir. 2017), in the Southern District Cour . t of Illinois. : A. Petitioner Diamond Barnes has shown a substantial denial of a Second(2"¢) Amendment Constitutional Right. —_ B. It is debatable to any reasonable jurist(s) that Petitioner Barnes, as a Virginian conceal-carry licensee (G. 112), has a constitutional right to bear arms "beyond the home'', New York State Pistol & Rifle Association v . Bruen, 142 S.Ct. 2111, 2122-2191 (2™ cir 2022). C. Deserves encouragement to proceed further in the seventh(7"), Circuit Co { urt_of Appeals. ~ 1: LIST. OF. PARTIES . The Petitioner-Appel lant, Diamond LaNeil Barnes, in his own natural-person, — is not a corporate-entity or agency.of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA). ~ Asa National-citizen via birthright, and State-citizen of Missouri, there is no parent or publicly held company owning 10% or more of any corporate ~ . stock; last-addressed at 3527 Sugarcrest Drive, Apt. F., Saint Lotiis, Miss. . . ouri 63033, oe The FELICIA ADKINS, WARDEN OF DANVILLE CORRECTIONAL C ; ; ENTER, in her OFF ICIAL-CAPACITY, is a corporation -hedd-quartered and doing : business in the STATE OF ILLINOIS. To the best of Appellant's knowledge & "belief » there is a parent or publicly held company owning 10% or more of t ; '-he Appellee's stock. As of present-day, a bill of ‘these particulars/are un. . known and. unavailable to Petitioner Barnes. FS