No. 23-7414
Mark A. VandenBoom v. Robert Strohmeyer
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts appellate-review circuit-court-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-precedent precedent pro-se pro-se-litigation
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judgement conflict with this court's precedents resulting in a limitation of access to the court due to the petitioner's pro se status?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judgement conflict with this court’s precedents resulting in a limitation of access to the court due to the petitioner’s pro se status? ‘Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judgement continue to allow Indiana state courts to systematically deny a citizen of their right to due process?
Docket Entries
2024-08-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-07-25
DISTRIBUTED.
2024-07-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Strohmeyer to respond filed.
2024-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2024)
Attorneys
Mark A. VandenBoom
Mark A. VandenBoom — Petitioner
Robert Strohmeyer
James Allen Barta — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent