Did the Second Court of Appeals err when they failed to apply their own standards under United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105 (2nd Cir. 2015), when dismissing Mr. Pratt's argument of staleness?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE COURT 1) Did the Second Court of Appeals err when they failed to apply their om standards under United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105 (2nd Cir. 2015), when dismissing Mr. Pratt's argument of staleness? 2) Relying on the sufficiency of a single, undocumented, second-hand conclusory statement of "the appearance of child pornography” for the determination of probable cause poses a question of exceptional . importance before the Court, needing Court guidance to resolve this “ conflict between the Circuit Courts. . 3) Did the lower courts so abandon their duty to "conscientiously review" when dismissing Fourth Amendment violations, and Court rulings such as : United States v. Leon under the bamers of "Novelty" and "Good Faith", that Supreme Court intervention is necessary?