Charles Talley, et al. v. Housing Authority of Cook County, et al.
DueProcess
Did the court's violate the Preemption Doctrine of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution in their failure to rule on disabled Appellant's 'MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE OF February 17,2023 AND MOTION TO VACATE VOID ORDER UNDER 735 ILCS 5/2-1407 (F)'?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. Bid the court's violate the Preemption Docirine of the Supremancy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, in thier failure to rule on disable Appellant's "MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE OF February 17,2023 AND MOTION TO VACATE VOID ORDER UNDER 735 LCS 5/2 1407 (F).” Where if void order were vacated, defendants Lee and Hart would have had to follow the rules prescribed by HUD in eviction of Appelianis, which was required by law (C.F.R.}. Thereby affording Appellants their consiiiutional rights to due process. 2. Was disable Appellants’ right fo trial oy jury violated, where the ; ; 7th Circuit Court of Appeals overlooked Appellant's Original _ Brief and