Did the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion by the affirmance of Petitioner's 240-month federal sentence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTON NUMBER ONE: Did the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion by the affirmance of Petitioner’s 240-month federal sentence when the district court failed to announce that it would have imposed the same sentence as an alternative variant sentence in light of all the 3553 factors; failed calculate the alternative Guideline range; and failed to properly justify the chosen alternative sentence, thus, did render his two federal sentence “substantively and procedurally unreasonable” in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling in Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 46 (2007) ?