No. 23-7436

Eagles Denashu Begay v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 28-usc-2255 appeal criminal-procedure direct-appeal due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance pro-se-claim right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED If an indigent, incarcerated federal defendant, for the first time on direct appeal, raises a colorable claim of ineffective assistance by his district court counsel, with support in the record but requiring additional factual development, should the U.S. Court of Appeals remand the case to the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the claim rather than require the defendant to raise a pro se claim in a future proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255? ii

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-18
Reply of petitioner Eagles Begay filed.
2024-09-18
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2024-09-09
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2024-09-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-08-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 9, 2024.
2024-08-05
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-08-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2024 to September 9, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-07-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 9, 2024.
2024-07-03
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-07-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 10, 2024 to August 9, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-06-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 10, 2024.
2024-06-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 10, 2024 to July 10, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-05-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2024)

Attorneys

Eagles Begay
Lisa S. BlattWilliams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner
Lisa S. BlattWilliams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner
Brent Evan NewtonAttorney at Law, Petitioner
Brent Evan NewtonAttorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent