Should Due Process be afforded to self-represented litigant in civil case against Catholic Church?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Should Due Process of Law as mandated by the United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment be afforded to self-represented litigant Plaintiff related to Civil Case against Catholic Church Defendant on the Matter of Leave to Amend Complaint? 2.) Should self-represented Plaintiff litigant Right to Appeal civil case be afforded despite Defendant being a Catholic Church and Roman Catholic Diocese? 3.) Should Conflict of Interest discovered by Petitioner in regards to Presiding Justice Kathleen O’Leary, CA Court of Appeals 4th District, Division Three ( CCP 170.1-170.9) i and her spouse Kenneth Babcock, Director of ‘ Public Law Center being recipient of multithousand dollar’s gifts / donations from not only MUFG Union Bank,NA (another defendant in which Plaintiff remains in litigation in the CA Supreme Court and for which Presiding Justice O'Leary denied her own recusal), but also Sisters of St. Joseph of Orange under the flagship of Defendants : Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange be sufficient to vacate dismissal judgments of this case. 3