Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

No question identified. : -| Eg Paluap used asym prey suo! pou (G9 Bay PY? “Cabs 2/9y S!Y 474 FV V9N9 ‘wog7 Fauatpyad Kuap of sperddy yo f1009 BYf Joy “JO149 f} som G a Pape porborsey Siw y YI {S24 Pan sun ”\p Gh FY 22eub) ap pyro, p2p0d Fvagey 57Y UIYE/O7 BIUPIONUY (onpgy 42 Sulye/p 3/9v10/09 Goew wa SI PYY Pye payasAvog by a4 Qvosen vaeg pry pYy fuszouUs S$! ay poy} -nag yp Yuya APS? UBAD CCormoy Cow ywapiag uy jay pve Vsanoa Sig 404 yasvaoy 40 Hurwpvioddy +24 +5 292o4 srovassiyed Luap of 4307 ayy Jey Gosse +! 1h 3 Pups povey reas dae sy op Kyvag oroeg yreg Adar pov vespigad sva gy SY UiYyien Pryets oY Yrryeney Swieyp saypo soreveynyed yo fo asoy bi ofp panag ay soy S013 4! som G Pias aydiag srveipigoe/ RYH! © KG Pals f! 249 a a a Cydoy Vay op verssruied 4200p: ,2d papur sl prey poneg zy pyytesvedsay syi4y oybrasyy HW? Pay FY frau Leseppy Pf POUL fAMO;) 2 Yd P747/% POY 29V0)} 149d J243% vars vsvedSe4 S7p>45 aye og | Adan party Kppuse, sreveryipod aoul} oy paneg ay} 324 Yass 4} sone ; LP PSS We/y Poo YYT Ly fUeuprouy fe vo. yapipsung Pee sson esd gap S4Vepuapep 40 . Vay (2 WW S24>4s Aj? | YOY) WIV Yavaso w7VvESONS 2Yy fo Ru yooy +e peaysu! Cyaryau SIDg Yri¥ry SWI¥/ 9 |9SVI0) VoL IA Yep 450d yo BUMPS! SSP PAYPILLIU! 40 Swiviy burag Se Sw)vfy Ssa7edd ene svaVerp4ed 42 GE |]? PerZitetoeroyasiw poy asvodsay seh PY UY Bic? posauab fousoppv BYP 251%) VF I~ Gpren EES Siou4f—e yp Us Svu:pad Voxpa/Auog 4sed Cvruap spmog apeys 44.09 af. Svarpaus~as asd 49 PUNY [OF ¥ Ul wey) papvasaud Kay Curawy r2p.s0 uaad)ucr4i4ad swoqey sy uryin pasiey Asedosd sauerp42d yo yor uy Suyr(a ss2701d BP GE BYP 21OUb) of pinoy Svoqry ayy JOFTO4I2 4! SOM (i GaLNasaud (S)NOLLSaND : :