No. 23-7445

Lloyd Kidd v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure district-court-discretion due-process electronic-evidence jurisdiction motion-to-suppress sufficiency-of-evidence summary-charts venue venue-challenge
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was there legally insufficient evidence to establish that venue was proper in the Southern District of New York for each count of conviction?

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : This appeal presents the following issues to be determined by this Court: IT. Was there legally insufficient evidence to establish that venue was _ proper in the Southern District of New York for each count of conviction? II. Was it reversible error for the district court to deny appellant's motion to suppress electronic devices seized in his apartment? ' IIT. Was it reversible error for the district court to admit into evidence | summary charts or reconstructions of alleged Backpage.com data over ; appellant's lack of foundation and hearsay objections? IV. Did the district court abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim P.33 to vacate his conviction and grant a new trial, or to hold an evidentiary hearing? It is respectfully submitted that each of the above questions should be answered in the affirmative.

Docket Entries

2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2024)

Attorneys

Lloyd Kidd
Lloyd Kidd — Petitioner
Lloyd Kidd — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent