Did the lower court abuse its discretion by denying appellant's petition for writ of actual innocence without looking at the totality, or assessing whether appellant/petitioner could establish a substantial or significant possibility that Moreira's misconduct could have caused his conviction on evidence known at the time of his trial, the result of which may have been different?

No question identified. : No. a13 . Septenteec Teemr Qoaa wD EN THOU : DSoOPHee Covarof THE udareD srarves AZASZAH @BLaShunsee PETIT TONER, VS. . STATE OF : ® = a — QLESTEONED PRESENTED | Ay Did the laowec Couct abuse 145 AiSecetion by deny al ect i tieanaec Pet itian foc weit OF ectual fanotence wi thas look ag feack of tne toatl , oc ASSESSi 0g Whether opp cNantk/odk toner could eStabli sh a Sobstastial ac Si qaik Cact possi miity that tad Mapeca's misconduct cance Carag hig Foca aq WiS DANE On evi degnce Fanowa at Me tine OF his toe, the cesust 6 HVS Koval May have becca ACCecent? 4 a) Did the ciccuit Court abuse its discretion Whe it denied Petitionec Cepeceseata ton far Vis weet c€ Actoal . VANG@GanNneée Weacing 2 so : Dod the lower Coucts ope ly INeorraect Veqal Standards Ond Fall to facoqa+ne New the newly Aiscaoveced evs dence would have Changed the case 14 Was eceSentad te tHe seey, lod ing Pati tr anecs trial Prepacation and albictate ty, the . . RECEIVED JAN 11 2024 SUE REE CORTE 4 State's li hel haod of Proving blaskumscc'S quit beyoud A Ceasonable doubt? . ; TA@LE oF CoStTENTS TAGQLE OF AUTHo@atTiESs 44 WYESTIONS Peesedren aL STATEMENT OF Facts 2 STATEMENT OF CASE. 2 TABLE OF ALTHO METTES Aetna Cas # SUC COLVv. B@cetheen tub, Das co SP Hd, 1234 (1477) 2 Bcrady Wind 273 us. 215 Cia&3) = Cacver.¥. 4d. No 14, Sept Fees ee 5 Conyens V-State Ba7 rid at Saw C2008 5 Eo Abcuguah, dec sien vo Wo at (ad2'> BES Hunt Vv. tla. COA. Seet Teo B Webina eco ABESAO A aao CoA Sept tere Ca0ia) s os da. GeoA ’ Metres WT : aA wo Te. Seer tecr Caeté> S meGhve ve sta oe 21S. S2%, 235 (14 24) = Yorheou v State. S15 mid a4 CITATIONS oF THE OFFETCEAL aD UNOFFICEAL Ae Pop ts OF OPXENTONS ASD anpeas ENTERED ES THE case. oo APPen) DEX... : DP Citecut Courts oc dec AVA OP ation PMVacch agth ao a9 7 (weit oF Actual INA cen ced icCuct ., . a) Cicece Coucts e¢dec ong SP 9109 | Maceh 23%) aoar +) : (not en For Appeintment of Counsel) 3, 8A Ce Bocted OP iaien cf the couch 6F Special Appeals oF ; Moculand.., Pecenbec P2, 202Q2Q. NO. a13. ; H oecdec of The Supreme Court oF Tle Cy Nenck 2. Septem bec 22,202: Petitioa Mockct No. (5Q... Sept Tecm 2oax STATENEAT OF THe BASES YoR Juexsprcetio al WHS Couct nes Sucisdict on te ceowew Wis Case ana Qeankt Ceomaw Fac weit oF Cectiocacr... Ww CONSTHT OTXO NAL. Peavrsrons MD coBbe ASN Coin Prcoc 3 -B-Botr..,. THE TOVATH AMENDS DMENT-/ TARE FEFTH Amend OmedNT-, . THE Fov@TeentTH AMTIENDMENST., \v ‘ AZANSTAH BLANK See TEN TWWe ONSTTIED STATES Agpliceat SoPAEME Coon “ September Teer 2022. NOQ1S State oF MAeYLAND Gerco:t caycr No .2ai-K04-03 1 APPetice MHA. , PETITION fot Wwenxt OF CeaTroraa and Cores Now, APPS ‘ coat, Awan) ah Blan hurS8E, Pa S¢, N les + . : aS Collows: me pee free foc wat of Cechkio ce! and States exceP} os olverwise oroeWided ian Tle 2 . \ “ ~ BO . Wher tre Couck of Appeals Tssues a writ of cece qO Comew a Case persiag 1a Ane couctk ef Specs] Appeals lee Face a deci Sion nas Peer Cfondeced lay that 4 Mat Couct, the court of Appeals will coneider those {SSueS thet WOOIA have Ween cog aitalele 4 the Casck of SPECial APPeals--. Role 8-131 CNe) , TN Whe. case. apo -dudice-. APPS edt. Nas pending a rratian foc Cansidecati on in the Coach OF SPecral: Appea \s fo owing Mriot Coots op 1a10eq afhicm vag the cscecai kt Couchs epinien + (deer sion). _ , AX \ssue, ond fo avoid expense, ana delay of anothe® Appeal, ace (s8u<S that were not decided RECEIVED ; DEC -8 2023 . OFFICE OF THE CLERK I SUPREME COUR, US. An tne Cicca.t Couck , and the couch of Special Apecats OPiaren For tnet Mattec-.. See Davidson v. State Ie md,aca mid 4StT(atD-; Tair Bole Qives aa apes tiate couck Hae AiSaccetiag Ya decide :Sssues not decided ia tne +e. a) COUCH Whee 14 is Necessary and desicatte Foo te qeidance of Hot couch and WOUldA AvotTA dre Qeces oy oF anew oeecet/ Actoa sos * suc CO. vv, Bcetnceo Net. Eas. co. 32 Md. App 1asH O97), Cece. denied, A®2 Na. 7ac M47 BY STATEMENT OF FACTS On o¢ alaout the Second CaudsOF Macch,