May the due process clause require the State Courts to provide a full and fair post-conviction proceeding, if authorized by state law and as such constitutes a protected liberty interest, be disregarded by the State Court?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; May the due process clause of the United States Constitution that require the State Courts to provide to Gefendants a full and fair post-conviction proceeding, if authorized by state law and as such constitutes a protected liberty interest, be disregarded by the State Court in that (1) the State Apellate Court failed to instruct the motion court to conduct an independent inquiry of Petitioner's claim of abandonment; (2) that although appointed post-conviction counsel in a State Rule 29.15 post-conviction : velief proceeding is required to meet with the movant in preparing the amended motion, said counsel failed to do so?