Whether the U.S. District Court's determination to dismiss the petitioner's case contradicts Supreme Court precedent

QUESTIONS PRESENTED D Are. USMS. | Diskick Conch Redoct & Kecommendation Ceasion(s) by [20, Sabato ond Court rules Sppedleble DITRECTLY te this Coon Wad the Petitioner believes the evidladice dud the recorch/ histo ok his/her case Sack claims Combined eh, Soprene Conch (yssch\ orececlest= lal Cases Contradicts the US-Dishict M.A.s deter minshan 2 douldit be S | iter locutory C 2» Does Las pethoners [ect ality Aas ONG a those Sooestable Sucisions;i SO, Lnclar ONY of the below listech Svenues tor Unitech Stotes So Preme Coots reyes) ON. Considardtions —')S Cost Fost Armond. vid (Nerbo€ Hebeds Corpus _0).S. Const FirstAmusdl. Wd WritoCCectiordri ~23 OSC. $1254 | —-93 OS.C.8 \GS1 sanees Saas specitieally (b)(4) (B,C cor sien hee ce a LC 4) Dees this case duck Whiston QdSS the "Skoma Plus ANalysis reguinncs, Due Hoes Holes to be inudkech as EXTRAORDINARY CERCOMSTANCES uy the Weed Gc OS. Supreme Coots exercise Rbtiee aE dddkess 3 MISCOMAIQe of ustice by the lower cootS misdeplicastion sof Y Clearly este blisheck lane’? } DY Cs the pebliones ei leds EMMEDIZATE ALISORCTAIVE ‘RELIEF {Sr being, subjected — ted Nationally Breadost/Mblidized dctice Peis Feel hie us 8 acpichen hozrdas ET IMS 7 Sakehy,0 scot hi and Yeonily ~aith close. boxcls ? s Hreads B) “Dees the Domlo rowski ‘Dect al nes Chilli No Ee cbla® dhe Firsk bmenckinesst S9ply to tho pelitionens ToS Tichts ds 8 Civil ardor Crimwel (got, érekeloss Bk iPso; dees iF enitle Foorth Netnenicdmenst, Seth Nemessturert, G0 Foorteedsth Dmnanck ment anttlemonts Rhy Pos pebitioners legal Riles, Mailings , research work preclods/ OES ,BUOL Jorumedtoy] aioe /ex hibits —— 3 level ob Qrotection aac. attorney “esque OAVSCY RIQhTS to prevent ance dameringS by cubside PIties ? 1e; regpondantt 5; vshiatoal PSC. resPonclanits 1A) civil acts) Way this cot Slease review 1%-Ael ,aadk_JS1S8" for Noyce otehiscrefion / misapplication oF [Bw = . Nxt PG LAUSU OF PARTIES: Al She parties do Hor APPAr WS the caction oP the case on the cover page. A