No. 23-7456
Eric Romero-Lobato v. United States
Tags: 8-usc-1252b compelling-circumstances deportation deportation-order immigration-law in-absentia in-absentia-proceeding minority-status noncitizen-status presumption-of-regularity statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the minority status of a noncitizen at the time an in absentia deportation order is issued falls among the compelling circumstances sufficient to warrant rescission of that order under 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(3)(A) (1994)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented for Review L. Whether the minority status of a noncitizen at the time an in absentia deportation order is issued falls among the compelling circumstances sufficient to warrant rescission of that order under 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(3)(A) (1994). I. Whether the presumption of regularity doctrine can be applied despite the absence of regularity. i
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Eric Romero-Lobato
Amy B. Cleary — Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent