No. 23-7460
William Burton v. Brian Emig, Warden, et al.
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel evidentiary-stipulation fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mccoy-v-louisiana plea-rights sixth-amendment strickland-standard
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel violated?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Was Petitioner’s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel violated when his trial attorney stipulated to the prosecution’s evidence without Petitioner’s consent and despite Petitioner’s plea of not guilty? i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2024)
Attorneys
William Burton