No. 23-7464

Michael Grady v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: abuse-of-discretion circuit-split conflict-of-interest constitutional-right constitutional-rights counsel-of-choice disqualification-of-counsel eighth-circuit
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eighth Circuit's decision to uphold the disqualification of Petitioner's counsel of choice deprived him of his constitutional right to representation by counsel of choice, created a circuit split by applying standards conflicting with those employed by other Circuits examining potential conflicts of interest, and allowed the Eighth Circuit to supplant its own reasoning for the district court's and thereby eliminate the abuse of discretion standard in cases involving disqualification of counsel of choice

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Eighth Circuit’s decision to uphold the disqualification of Petitioner’s counsel of choice despite Petitioner’s willingness to knowingly and intelligently waive any potential conflict of interest (1) deprived him of his constitutional right to representation by counsel of choice, (2) created a circuit split by applying standards conflicting with those employed by other Circuits examining potential conflicts of interest, and (3) allowed the Eighth Circuit to supplant its own reasoning for the district court’s and thereby eliminate the abuse of discretion standard in cases involving disqualification of counsel of choice.

Docket Entries

2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-08

Attorneys

Michael Grady
Beau B. BrindleyThe Law Offices of Beau B. Brindley, Petitioner
Beau B. BrindleyThe Law Offices of Beau B. Brindley, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent