Is procedural due process violated regarding the constitutional requirement of a meaningful or effective appeal of right under Evitts, Griffin and Douglas, where the reviewing court does not address and rule on its merits each dispositive issue raised?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Is procedural due process violated regarding the constitutional requirement of a meaningful or effective appeal of right under Evitts, Griffin and Douglas, where the reviewing court does not address and rule on its merits each dispositive issue raised? 2. Does a State’s failure to follow its own appellate rules, as under Issue 1, entail a due process violation cognizable on direct appeal where the federal ruling sought will not necessarily imply the invalidity of a conviction, sentence, or length or conditions of confinement? 2