No. 23-7481
Maurice Owen Wiley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy crime-of-violence criminal-conspiracy double-jeopardy fifth-amendment firearms firearms-possession hobbs-act
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the imposition of consecutive punishments for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery and conspiracy to possess firearms in furtherance of a crime of violence violate the Double Jeopardy Clause?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED DOES THE IMPOSITION OF CONSECUTIVE PUNISHMENTS FOR CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT HOBBS ACT ROBBERY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a) and CONSPIRACY TO POSSESS FIREARMS IN FURTHERANCE OF A CRIME OF VIOLENCE IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 924(0) VIOLATE DEFENDANT'S RIGHTS UNDER THE UNDER THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WHERE THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED SHOWED A SINGLE CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A ROBBERY WITH A FIREARM? ii
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2024)
Attorneys
Maurice Wiley
John David Bryson — Wyatt, Early, et al., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent