Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The supervised-release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), lists factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for a court to consider when sentencing a person for violating a supervised-release condition. In that list, Congress omitted the factors set forth in section 3553(a)(2)(A)—the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense. The question presented is: Even though Congress excluded section 3553(a)(2)(A) from section 3583(e)’s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, may a district court rely on the section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release? Five circuit courts of appeals, including the panel orders below, have concluded that district courts may rely on the section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors. Four circuit courts of appeals, plus the dissents from orders denying rehearing en banc below, have concluded that they may not. i
2025-06-20
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Barrett, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-7483_6k4c.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined, and in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined as to all but Part II-B. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Jackson, J., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined.
2025-06-20
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED Barrett, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-7483_6k4c.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined, and in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined as to all but Part II-B. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Jackson, J., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in party and concurring in the judgment. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined.
2025-02-25
Argued. For petitioners: Christian J. Grostic, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Cleveland, Ohio. For respondent: Masha G. Hansford, Assistant to the Solicitor
General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
2025-02-05
Reply of petitioner Edgardo Esteras filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-05
Reply of Edgardo Esteras submitted.
2025-01-15
Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)
2025-01-15
Brief of United States submitted.
2024-12-04
Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and available with the Clerk.
2024-12-03
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
2024-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 10, 2024. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 15, 2025.
2024-11-22
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, February 25, 2025.
2024-11-18
Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
2024-10-21
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.
2024-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-06
Reply of petitioner Edgardo Esteras filed.
2024-09-06
Reply of Edgardo Esteras submitted.
2024-08-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-07-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 30, 2024.
2024-07-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 29, 2024 to August 30, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-07-22
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-06-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 29, 2024.
2024-06-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 27, 2024 to July 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-05-28
Response Requested. (Due June 27, 2024)
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.