No. 23-7484
Lorenzo M. Wilson, et ux. v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: arbitration civil-procedure constitutional-requirement due-process finding-of-fact finding-of-law findings-of-fact findings-of-law motion-to-compel trial-court
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess
Arbitration DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-11-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the United States Constitution require the trial court to make a finding of fact and law in the granting or denying a motion to compel arbitration?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED DOES THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION REQUIRE THE TRIAL COURT TO MAKE A FINDING OF FACT AND LAW IN THE GRANTING OR DENYING A MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. ? i
Docket Entries
2024-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-26
Petitioners complied with order of October 7, 2024.
2024-10-07
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 28, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-29
Waiver of right of respondent Hanania Automotive Group to respond filed.
2024-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 14, 2024)
2024-01-02
Application (23A609) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 10, 2024.
2023-12-28
Application (23A609) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 11, 2024 to March 6, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Hanania Automotive Group
Jeffrey L. Ingram — Ingram, Kalupa & Butler, P.C. , Respondent
Lorenzo Wilson, et al.
Lorenzo M. Wilson — Petitioner