No. 23-7486
Edgar Vazquez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing motion-to-dismiss motion-to-suppress standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether certiorari review should be granted
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF VAZQUEZ’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE VAZQUEZ’ MOTION TO SUPPRESS WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Il. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF VAZQUEZ’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE VAZQUEZ’ MOTION TO SUPPRESS. i
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 14, 2024)
Attorneys
Edgar Vazquez
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent