No. 23-7489
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights collective-defense due-process free-speech international-organization military-agreement nato-alliance separation-of-powers sovereign-rights standing treaty-clause
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Chief Justice John Roberts is allowed to remove 'Liberty' from the Supreme Court's motto
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1. In Civil Action No. 18-527, Dingler v. Roberts, Is Chief Justice John Roberts allowed to remove ‘Liberty’ fr
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-13
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.