No. 23-7501
Maurice Farris v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-922 bruen-standard constitutional-challenge constitutional-law criminal-law gun-rights new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-v-bruen second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Farris's conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Mr. Farris’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022). i
Docket Entries
2024-11-08
Judgment Issued.
2024-10-07
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-17
Memorandum For the United States of United States submitted.
2024-07-17
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2024-06-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 17, 2024.
2024-05-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 17, 2024 to July 17, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-05-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2024)
2024-04-09
Application (23A893) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until May 15, 2024.
2024-04-04
Application (23A893) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 15, 2024 to May 15, 2024, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Maurice Farris
Leah D. Yaffe — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Leah D. Yaffe — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent