Whether a court applied the correct standard in dismissing a complaint alleging a violation of the Indian Civil Rights Act

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whe ley a court applied tho covtect cotomdlayel bn chbanizenna ; eveyy SS moa Creek conection ott a question (om lata against Spyino C ee TT of vad Thnied My tone Joy Divcoverts EM ove fo p , ARGUMENT | sie Disiner court Ewed in Didmieena Kones complatut ft , Alaska coulle have on oblfontion to eneuve zea Laut cmel compet ; oe tnlian by DI BCOVETH, ; | he ditual eeehind, complatet rieh hae o constthonal jak 10 the Meet vustohance of counsel o Witigntion hi a pplication and cous lear egos for ensuvino, an agplicant revesvee the repre ceitation to which Serttilled® AD Wie court has ex, lait, Courts have the conchhon a 1e% onal appl to mete. extve ie on) mmeltgent a ppl aN] I eect ved) i 4 a% dats eleded to he merit of he pettton -nof olism ieéedl eimpls teomute he cell nat es for the Diocoverts ' Alosker Const, cf See Howarth v, Stake, 13 8 So ¥51, ¥56 (Maske 2 App.gooo/ . | Gvilfin v, Stoke, 18 0.201 4,75 (Baskin bpp 2001) , ,