Whether Michigan's involuntary mental health treatment hearings comply with the mandatory language of the statute and prison policy directive, and whether the courts' application of the exhaustion requirement for administrative remedies regarding the manner of the hearing is unreasonable

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. In cegocds 40 prison involonracy srearxal heelfh Yceatmeak heasings 10 whic Ye mondarkocy longuage of Nhe stokure of Michigan complied Low 330.20030 as wellas psison policy dicective O4, OR. NBZ nvolunkacy Hreakmenk Lnamoiguously helds Mak oll a Esisones musk do +o exhaust Nheis adeanishsoaive. sesmedies cegosding Yne sktoctuce / Way in which Moe hearing is held is +o TIN cox Ave Rocm provided, would i+ no® be contcasy +o of an uaceasonanie application of cleosly esrololished supceme coucky \ew for Ake cousks Yo busden a eXsenec YO de ete Maea Shoal in which is cleos ly cequiced by MeL & Policy olcective F