No. 23-7524
Antoinne Lee Washington, aka Antionne Lee Washington v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights due-process eighth-circuit habeas-corpus standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the panel of the Eighth Circuit err by deciding the merit of an appeal not properly before the court to justify the denial of a certificate of appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1 DID THE PANEL OF THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ERR BY DECIDING THE MERIT OF AN APPEAL NOT PROPERLY BEFORE THE COURT TO JUSTIFY THE DENIAL OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Ir DID THE PETITIONER MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING THAT HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent