Did the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit use the incorrect standard to review the issues and thus incorrectly apply the law?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED i. Did the Drotriet Court andl the Eleventh Cweuit Uae the Incowecd Standavel to reviews the (s9ue5 and thus imcowec dy apply the lau under? Tolan v. Cotton, i. Ts the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit Courts decigion then both” Contvary to” ov involves an Unveasonahle application of Clearly established federal laws, cle becminedd hy the United States Supveme Court, 3% Noes the probable Cause standavad capply to state law Claims heceuse the Concept uncley Secheveal laws is “Sovereign lmamunity” not qualified immunity . q, Uncler Whitela, way the yu cial officer Supplied work oufh cient information to Sug port au independant judgment that probable tause existed for the warrant? B. Mich Ahe Diodeicd Court eve Yay dis missing the pusposeful discs min tion Claims and used the incovvect Standard based on racial ani mug aul not petitione's Cvimincl Wistory. G& Dic the Eleventh Circuit ancl /or Couch appeintedt Couwsel properly tack Awely net; fy the PelitionesPaul , or the” Mandate” anteved on September MM, yous! 1 = =Did appellant's Counsel fusl to propedty vepvesent him Vr heating to proviele him @ copy of the Agvetlate Brief or Consult Garth him here AI: the ray “5 Initial bvief Chluecover)? % Was the District doust and the Eleventh Crecuit Court decision hasecl on an Unreasonable deternmation atthe lacks in \ight wf the evidence presented in the tviel Court proceedings 1