No. 23-7536

Donna M. Brown v. Thomas U. Brown

Lower Court: Louisiana
Docketed: 2024-05-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-procedure due-process ex-parte-proceeding fraud fraud-on-the-court judicial-fraud standing subpoena-duces-tecum void-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a person has a constitutional right to impugn a judgment procured by fraud and fraud on the court?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED | 1. Whether a person has a constitutional right to impugn a judgment procured by fraud and fraud on the court? 2. Whether state appellate court has a duty to vitiate a void judgment? 3. Does it violate the U.S. Constitution 14 Amendment due process when a state Supreme court affirms an appellate court’s decision that neglects to review issues presented on appeal regarding a void judgment? 4. Cana judgment procured ex parte constitute a valid judgment? 5. If attorneys negotiate, draft, forge a joint stipulation agreement without authorization on behalf of litigants and file it in the record of the court to procure a consent judgment constitutes a fraud and fraud on the court? 6. Whether it constitutes an unfair and impartial trial when a judge grants a motion to strike a subpoena of duces tecum requesting relevant and admissible information from the opposing party?

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-03-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2024)

Attorneys

Donna M. Brown
Donna M. Brown — Petitioner
Donna M. Brown — Petitioner