No. 23-7537
Mike Austin Anderson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process judicial-procedure jury-instructions jury-verdict motion-to-revoke recusal-motion standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred by finding that the prosecution produced sufficient evidence at trial for a reasonable jury to return a guilty verdict against Mr. Anderson
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) | Whether the district court erred by finding that the prosecution produced sufficient evidence at trial for a reasonable jury to return a guilty verdict against Mr. Anderson. 2) | Whether the district court erred by denying Mr. Anderson’s Motion to Revoke or Amend Magistrate Judge’s Denial of Defendant’s Motion to Order Recusal. i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Mike Austin Anderson
Michael Scott Davis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Michael Scott Davis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent