No. 23-7539

Eddie Lamar Thomas v. Don Langford, Warden

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process fifth-amendment investigative-detention miranda-warnings self-incrimination
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court violated Mr. Thomas's Fifth Amendment rights by admitting his statements to detectives and evidence derived from those statements

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Mr. Thomas alleged that the district court violated his Fifth Amendment rights. Mr. Thomas was convicted, in larger part, from his statements made to detectives and evidence derived from those statements. The Tenth Circuit relied on the lower court’s ruling that statements did not warrant Miranda warnings and the statements were made during the part of the interview that was ruled to be | noncustodial and investigative in nature. 1

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2024)

Attorneys

Eddie Lamar Thomas
Eddie Lamar Thomas Jr. — Petitioner
Eddie Lamar Thomas Jr. — Petitioner