No. 23-7551

In Re Kinley MacDonald

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-05-23
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: best-interests child-custody constitutional-rights due-process family-law judicial-discretion
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Would a state court's refusal to intervene on behalf of a child in a custody dispute violate due process rights and the child's best interests?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

i> cfi. c.ki\A ■VW. Cjo ■V ra. CC ickeA maVer \r\ool Kta-rsa. ^ora Ort u.r*\5> a_ \t-pe ^>a\ra bl £ karrf\ . Tkfi_ \k^o CoSkr by C_a.rcrao4Wr S'-a-'f-C'^ rtJl e.moV\otx<A Q.S r-eSaH-. Tl~e ct *45 Uj<?ccpoO\tec5l VC-aV ejUsW&S ( VWe oK ’.ldreO ^ ‘^USV\£y VW. re n^CUOL re^^SeA Vo t<\4<rvKNC. ot\ be-kcAC ©C vVU_ C-bAjlre r\Vo rc.4 (o a-cA \ \>€ re^x-^aV 46 er\oiNC\K^ Cosher et6u.se f r\c^e cS~ t «,Ntk v-a OoM>v*Ad ela boraVe\r<\a. OLf\<il Cxira j^ 1^1 C-',°A Q-COu-SaA'i&i\S 4o Vc.Tm ’\N«'<Ccl Co.m''Ay i (ju>KxcArv etb<£4efvVv £>rs .SarcVv&rNS Su ck cx Qrv^l ar\A A-e^ef4u.< sO fit SeRUj, g4ate ; CeJ6Us<K \fv\e_.r \ fl_u^ c>ack vVaV1 "\VvvS p-eAx-V ioo iS Os_. 0 r 'J, Cor -\Vv'\S> C©i».rV-Vo CX-eroV-SC. \V 1 b Sc-cOC-O l/ i S 6^1 ) ^pV"“7 bsCnSC Q$I rs ex OlU jur.i^c^'vfc^ Cor ©4Kw.rrva.rs r\ sKAS (Sl-e.^rWaVN 6 0 ercA3 f ^U'vskj 4Ws Oasd — THESE CHI IDS BV JU'io £C T\K. pOu^T, ~Tkar> k.I6* *-V\rroe.,v°ur I) c. eUi £*-<\ cl 5U4. 54-ft.VcVo$>^ dieftVS feoSc^S<4eA bs/ <S4oA-0 S4ciWVcS ♦VecMoo £as£__ ctaainsVn o t\. ^>rc $ Koa rS«. pe<3 k{ 4;^-ecl u_S»a.4 vor\ $ry ^U.. Q. L.ifl £ ui I a d ^v.S^e_ iixyo^iKct, V-ke. Scit^Cdi<L \r\/ / -VVt r\,UJKAoSrW>«^'jA Cl, C.r»fO'^etl C.O.SC. lo>Unl cK,(J p6rius ( ^sk;K.'4 A sU^'S S4a4^4-6r a -Q>av'.Iy ArO Com fAa.AU a 4-<L ( U'tSHre A aKL AOA 4. K’ 4icS re u.o v rctlleJu) y respeos :40 4eio ^ Car. Ck ’ildrt/Na prokcMw^_ OuS^oiy \r\eA co<xrVortU.r romooci | rf. S\ Co Avi ©Kt-rr\er^cA<Y bos^Sjicv y proKt^.'IcJ Ia oa a Orv AA O rv S W4 w.\ or 'X 7 ^'mK bascA Soi^-|Scy <r€<s* rP. 1/3 <C -yKreer.fc/n Ji$~ CtC ct" Ct)Vik kcr !' IkeA <-u<?a.poo 4-^.t gu-N ©£ O-K'.ld et&u&cj r^cj toofDChild abu^C. jr^le.t$«_ pro^eV'^C Custody dec reusedM.) CLiUr, CX. 4ac«A COUrt rAo<J-kr UJi^k Turtle Ck-UtfA ^o Ooense. aa lla^ree/rvtA ‘t;' TA€aV '.Mq a a clA AM-SS. iQA cd lO~\^tou.V ■(oc.^S or Cui\AcAc£_ OLOyCf ’Prr^Ai ©f e(sr cOke^C^/A i-h^b & >fo c4-5 o-e. *tSS ~ ^Lt_ OetcivAct a^S GHeflt-. Syik/^AC £> V\S4©.K.4 Cou.Aid| J ci<?Ay a. etpp<?«( ^/A-kru^A^ C J;scrti\cr^ ar^L :oJto«©( fv\\Se crJia^dto ftree ^krors}/^ I SjF*rr\t(j dcptiised of '{Irsh' CjC ouHK r o Acl ^ IGla art-\eri F<t am ly fra /v^o 'fe_d 0 a// o re-ti f«?c*Ji t*'*y, or\ &bt*kz process ^ jv^r^ireik)A j 'Ostud J/ / arvA, tdr\ 6. b n be o ClMoc\ ©C oi^ah I rr q Kto <5 An rtf J4<s Mi^ok# y<?<! crcc+to«_ djpporiuo ’.^ t“ \o&+ rcs.or-v re^u^e. to totor\>€r^_ ktorJ-o rd ck re j \ ecxJ © £ e j! cto«c ( u, £\<\ Ov« fjlt aa AO$'<& OO c* ■^to. Sto^CCoufrt A u}toW JUcUrl^ a rv mj5©■£ peopl-e.) tW'*re 11 ©CO S&ito. >4©Ol on asH*& C PTSDJ oU^sSicr^ f o 0kJdfr€4 f\-Tfvfo ko n^ei» ^ k y upropo AAt.ro At-e_ ©t eo^Ace * is uj«©paJy 0©txf^* k-a.j, de^et^i r^ke-d ^ S toi€. reefer/\,0.u»\ b S upr>t rH_ k© <VVt. rOivN (Jtfdri ik~ Krj’wirrSp^Lopto. a oloss e^« c StecU pH & u m pt^Voa S ( Ab-y t/v "X/11 Ao j s f *^0^ ^ (&nS >‘4 ^*/9 ^2^ J lt Ct^A a/si. CoAU.A^i/^. evii^Ace, ai^fic j a<l<j OwA' j 06*-Ol O^ex)) ?peireA'iS A r«./*4f* , “iXS 01.) Igkf hriSv WWa Vhd^rAiio a^S. totted cu WxJ € A© ^Q%kr obukC, j A&x^fe CaA. 4U SVcito C.r\fVi^\ CiDLcrt cl r^o^Wr^ AolJ ker u>avVv. ^f»rtfiSoc^M'C j b Cjja^ «ixOAS VrciwAi C-ky 1(1 ryA, ^4^ f\© CPa!c-x?c vO'x^Vv V-G f p© r ^ y F©c *«l £ j A hkmp •$-,$ g e£ j 4-Lt.r\ eck© fr. pet s*,\ I O rd® rV%-l c s W*"®-* ^ .r-v e>^* |cl$^ foeA'V* d-ef'y % P)d(^r fo (Lorrtci*ku ^n«f 0©urr^U®SC. £.iw<&C^ i-O Zi f*\\ *“ Cti^A if\kib-'i ‘ C t-C C ci t t,*C= Oou-A ici <2 A C \ (^ 1 Irvck fAs$4«» <$, f1 &uf'±e{ /]A <xn a fv/<a/\t i©aI: fy\otU r ' S*vuK^tcsU J.eert\$, if CL^W m^ Vo ©ply 0^K\bl^W„ <© {"<v\ ^«t P©a4^ (^ / /fed Ct ftTre av Al 'kit ^ *©^4 £©uri©k 1*.f ^ Of\ r©/ssk,-kci (£t/^(tf kt lj i /\j OOl\\ j herd &0pdti }ac(uj,i ©fcfcSrv f\6A Q.k\tdt&i f\r I r c\ juc5 i C/\u\ A rsd. j /Wo'lkr^ Ka^ /s£.tNe p l-eeV kex~ dki^KLo a.>vA f^v or o^U? r u^S £ ,^ Ca n^M'5 h.£€Q,i*&&~ £kt )£ &€} ^a ’fl ur4&r f\|© OoAktt u u*uk Kerrv cl. Ua a! (LftJ | kC.r C?r\£'V(bcravt&c. ©k <2-M <3 £ /rneM-c^ Kcal^k fic.cV lSftke^ ; Would ne»>er a£uSc= orr\ <x AS Nc.3a COuSed<£>C

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-01-19
Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2024)

Attorneys

Kinley MacDonald
Kinley MacDonald — Petitioner
Kinley MacDonald — Petitioner